Why NAB should rule out funding more oil and gas

Learn more about NAB’s current oil and gas lending policy review and how you can use your voice as a NAB staff member to create change.

Financing gas is inconsistent with the Paris Climate Accord and net zero emissions by 2050.

NAB has led the way in committing to aligning their lending portfolio with net zero emissions by 2050 and the Paris Agreement. The International Energy Agency has modelled a pathway to net zero emissions by 2050 and their report states that investment in new fossil fuel supply is inconsistent with the pathway to net zero emissions.1 It is explicit that this includes no new gas fields and that liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities under construction or at the planning stage are not needed. It also flags that existing gas fields may be closed prematurely.2

The IEA report shows that new gas projects in Australia – including those in the Beetaloo Basin, the Canning Basin, the Narrabri Gas Project, and the Scarborough project and LNG processing facility – are not compatible with reaching net zero emissions by 2050 and should not be financed.

[1] International Energy Agency, 2021, “Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector”, p 21.

[2]  Ibid, p 102.

Photograph: J David Ake/AP

It’s a land rights issue.

Traditional Owners across the country, from the Beetaloo Basin in the Northern Territory to Narrabri in NSW have consistently opposed oil and gas extraction on their land. In the Northern Territory, 51% of the land is covered by exploration licences for oil and gas, threatening to pollute Aboriginal owned land and destroy sacred sites. Communities should have the right to say what happens on their country but at the moment, the government gives more power to gas companies. There’s nothing to stop more Juukan Gorge style disasters happening right across the country. NAB should not be financing oil and gas on Aboriginal land when traditional owners don’t have the right to say no.

It’s a risky investment.

Australian oil and gas companies wrote off $25 billion in assets in the first six months of 2020. In addition, Australian gas companies have lost between 50-70% of their value since 2011.

Already many of Australia’s key coal and gas export partners, such as South Korea, China, Taiwan and Japan, have committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050-60. Analysis shows that over 80% of Australia’s top twenty trading partners have pledged net zero emissions by mid-century.3 These policies put a clear timeline on the end of coal and gas exports from Australia. It is clear that fossil fuel industries do not have a viable economic future in a carbon constrained world.

[3]  The Australian Financial Review, 9 February 2021, “Global climate action will reshape Australia’s trade”, available here.

What NAB should do.

We are calling on NAB to align their lending policies with net zero emissions. This means:

  • refusing to finance new oil and gas projects, and;
  • exiting existing oil and gas investments by 2030.


What NAB staff can do 

  1. Your voice matters – NAB prides themselves on staff satisfaction. Make it clear that taking climate change seriously matters to staff by raising the issue internally and asking for the new policy to be in line with the IEA report.
  2. Fill in our anonymous survey to let the NAB executive know how their staff feel about more investments in fossil fuels.

Take the survey